Talking Union performed by Pete Seeger, Tom Glazer, Hally Wood Faulk, & Ronnie Gilbert in 1947 [via this post, which is a wealth of union music]
Talking Union performed by Pete Seeger, Tom Glazer, Hally Wood Faulk, & Ronnie Gilbert in 1947 [via this post, which is a wealth of union music]
The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life.
Between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers of the world organize as a class, take possession of the means of production, abolish the wage system, and live in harmony with the Earth.
We find that the centering of the management of industries into fewer and fewer hands makes the trade unions unable to cope with the ever growing power of the employing class. The trade unions foster a state of affairs which allows one set of workers to be pitted against another set of workers in the same industry, thereby helping defeat one another in wage wars. Moreover, the trade unions aid the employing class to mislead the workers into the belief that the working class have interests in common with their employers.
These conditions can be changed and the interest of the working class upheld only by an organization formed in such a way that all its members in any one industry, or in all industries if necessary, cease work whenever a strike or lockout is on in any department thereof, thus making an injury to one an injury to all.
Instead of the conservative motto, “A fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work,” we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary watchword, “Abolition of the wage system.”
It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.
—
Preamble to the IWW Constitution
Spending the morning getting kind of worked up reading the news
In Union There Is Strength. Fraternal Order of Police, Cleveland,Ohio.
And what they got was a measure of job security. The union represents instructional faculty who teach on fixed-term contracts, people who often piece together jobs from one semester to the next. Last semester, it had 503 members, but it’s uncertain work and the numbers will fluctuate.
In the past, members say, they frequently didn’t know in July whether they’d be teaching again in August. Under the terms of the contract, the university now must notify faculty one month before the end of one assignment whether their contracts will be renewed. Further, those who teach in a single department for 10 semesters within six years will be eligible for three-year contracts down the road should they pass a performance review.
The contract also addresses pay, including money for merit raises for those with a decade or more of service and a 10 percent increase in minimum salary levels. That brings the lowest possible academic-year salary up to $25,593 for lecturers, $33,409 for assistant professors and $51,184 for full professors.
good!
one big union, one big fist [via]
Our aim shouldn’t just be to shame capitalists into acting against their own interests, but to expose their true nature and advocate their abolition. The existing unions can’t and won’t do this; it is not just the methods but the aims and objectives of social democrats which fail the working class.
— Anarchist journal Direct Action #47 - Why the Unions Fail us
Confronting Adamic’s text seventy-five years after the fact demands that readers ask themselves a number of difficult and politically loaded questions: to what extent is our seemingly peaceful labor system already (and always) bound up in the latent violence of capital? The very notion of a post-war labor “peace” conceals the underlying violence upon which that “peace” was brokered. The illusion of labor peace is predicated upon the state’s power to unleash violence against workers should they break their end of the deal. Was the subsumption of the American labor movement under layers of government bureaucracy–in exchange for an end to violence–on the whole a victory for workers? Or has the post-war labor peace been an unequal compromise? Certainly, no unionist is nostalgic for the days when a worker could be shot dead for walking a picket line, but the alternative we have isn’t that great either.
Don Skidmore, president of U.A.W. Local 735 which represents 1,100 workers at a G.M. transmission plant in Ypsilanti, Mich., that is to close. (Fabrizio Costantini for The New York Times) [via]
As much as I enjoy celebrating labor radicalism, today is not the day for it; today belongs to the establishmentarian unionists and the government labor bureaucracy and the bosses who use union patronage as a means of control over workers. They made it and they can have it.
By covering up the history of May Day, the state, business, mainstream unions and the media have covered up an entire legacy of dissent in this country. They are terrified of what a similarly militant and organized movement could accomplish today, and they suppress the seeds of such organization whenever and wherever they can. As workers, we must recognize and commemorate May Day not only for it’s historical significance, but also as a time to organize around issues of vital importance to working-class people today.