All the wealth that black and white workers had created was looted from the city by the capitalists and moved out to the suburbs or down to the southern United States. Along with that went the tax base of the city, and forty years later the city is falling apart due to an emaciated infrastructure. This story is shared by other cities where brown and black folks rose up to take their city back. Gary, Indiana and Newark, New Jersey are only two more examples. I’ve heard Detroit described by visitors as resembling a war zone — well that’s what it is; it’s the American Third World.
Growing up in Detroit you learn to appreciate the hidden beauty of a city gutted by white supremacy and capitalism. The resilience of the people there, despite all we’ve endured, is one testament to black civilization and oppressed peoples everywhere. I have friends from the east coast who say that Detroit and much of the Midwest has its own unique form of scathing charm that is normally attributed to the tough personality types of New York. To survive in a war zone you gotta be tough. The working classes of New York live in a city which some of the most brutal capitalists in the world call their home, and everyday they go head-to-head with these capitalists. In Detroit it’s a little different. We were left for dead, and despite that, and all the odds stacked against us, we remind the bosses, the crackers and the cops that we’re still here.

— The Landscape of Detroit [via&via]

Interestingly enough, it seems like a large part of the reason that makes it so difficult for a disruptive response to occur is, paradoxically, the history of revolt in Detroit. In Detroit, working class conflict has entirely reconfigured the urban landscape. The riots of the 1960s were a catalyst for white flight and the subsequent loss of business investment and decline in home equity. The factory struggles of the following decade were followed by years of deindustrialization and unemployment, as factories moved to areas that lacked dedicated and confrontational workplace movements. In short, Capital responded to the popular struggles of the past decades by transforming Detroit into a desolate landscape of empty streets and abandoned buildings. In this environment it is difficult to imagine many places for people to spontaneously congregate, because people are spread so far apart, separated by blocks and blocks of vacant lots and foreclosed homes.

— Detroit, Do You Mind Dying?

Detroit and Cleveland are places where we actually get to decide what our future is here. Is that the case in the other big cities?

— Detroit Dan commenting on Guest Editorial: The Stigma of the Small City

Detroit has a vast supply of decayed and vacant buildings, many of them architectural treasures. Even if MCD is somehow restored, it will be one of only a handful saved, while so many others will languish for some time. Many, like the Lafayette Building, may become so damaged that they have to be torn down.
What if instead of spending a huge amount of money to try to save one building, the city found a little bit of money to do basic maintenance to preserve the structural integrity of many buildings – and create a safe path through parts of them that tourists could walk through similar to how ancient ruins are displayed in Europe. Heck, don’t even clean the buildings up. That saves money and makes them even more impressive to visitors. This could preserve more structures for the long haul, and create a tourist attraction. The structures can always been renovated later when demand warrants.
Actually, the tourists are already coming whether it is authorized or not. Thirty folks a day at MCD is pretty impressive

—

Detroit: Embracing the Ruins

I find this idea both really obvious (and as mentioned, currently occurring) and also interesting in that it challenges popular ideas about what kind of ‘ruins’ are meaningful/educational/valuable/historical.