I use ‘violence’ in scare quotes because such a wide range of tactics are considered violent by the dominant culture, whether it’s breaking windows, setting fires, blocking intersections, or even dragging newspaper boxes into the street, irrespective of the fact that none of these things involve hurting people. More unnervingly, many ‘radicals,’ whether overtly or unconsciously, buy into this framework. How many times have you read accounts of street actions where the writers repeatedly refer to ‘peaceful protesters,’ ‘non-violent demonstrators,’ or hope to inspire outrage against incidences of police repression against ‘non-violent activists’? The presupposition here is that it would be totally OK for the police to smash the faces and ribs of people smashing windows. That, as soon as someone oversteps the bounds of law, in place to protect property and preserve privilege, they are making an ‘illegitimate protest’ and their concerns aren’t to be taken seriously and we aren’t to be concerned when they get a judicial smackdown.

— BAAM Issue #25 - Page 7 - Who You Callin’ Violent? By Adrienne

1. clothedinsky liked this
2. worldextermination liked this
3. iisabelle reblogged this from bradicalmang
4. iisabelle liked this
5. bradicalmang reblogged this from anthropophagous
6. cantarelgallo liked this
7. igather liked this
8. anthropophagous posted this