What follows is a fragment of a much larger project of research on debt and debt money in human history. The first and overwhelming conclusion of this project is that in studying economic history, we tend to systematically ignore the role of violence, the absolutely central role of war and slavery in creating and shaping the basic institutions of what we now call ‘the economy’. What’s more, origins matter. The violence may be invisible, but it remains inscribed in the very logic of our economic common sense, in the apparently self-evident nature of institutions that simply would never and could never exist outside of the monopoly of violence - but also, the systematic threat of violence - maintained by the contemporary state. [via]

1. noblank liked this
2. alohanico reblogged this from anthropophagous
3. becoming-wave liked this
4. hushpoint liked this
5. rivertrash liked this
6. anthropophagous reblogged this from m-x and added:

   What follows is a fragment...a much larger project...money...

7. anthropophagous liked this
8. m-x posted this