01.22.2012 11:29

∞ permalink / 3 notes

Under Duress: Agency, Power and Consent, Part One: “No”

The question, if asked at all, is rarely as straightforward as, “Do you want to have sex?” and it’s often hedged around with codes. “Do you want to come in for coffee?” Asking is a vulnerable act, and the need for self-defence is understandable. Sometimes, ambiguous statements can make a situation easier for everyone involved. “Coffee?” “No thanks, I’d best get back” is a clear negotiation in which nobody loses face. Ambiguity places the asker in a less vulnerable position, which deescalates the situation and allows a refusal to be offered in a way which isn’t socially transgressive according to norms of, for example, female socialisation. [via]

  1. becoming-wave said: i appreciate those codes. when i was younger the direct question “do you want to have sex” always made me feel like i should say yes (because it’s not WRONG right? why say no?) it’s easier to say no ambiguously.
  2. how-to-kiss-distinctly-american liked this
  3. m-x liked this
  4. anthropophagous posted this

anthropophagous

Archive Audio Images RSS Feed

This is just a collection of things I think are neat.

A general overview of 'things I think are neat':abandonment/the post-industrial midwest, anarchism (syndicalism, insurrectionalism, etc), race/ethnicity (esp. defining/constructing the boundaries of whiteness), gender, class (talking/thinking about class generally seems to be an underrated activity), health care (access to, the experience of obtaining, etc), art, science fiction, punk music, conservative talk radio and anthropology (which probably incorporates almost everything else about people).





  • « back
  • forward »

Powered by Tumblr